Monday, June 1, 2020

Concluding my Term as Bar Council Family Law Committee Co-Chairperson wef 1.6.2020

This farewell post was written on 30.5.2020 to the FLC members. 

Dear members,

I am so grateful to have had the privilege of serving the Bar Council as the Chair and Co-Chair of the Family Law Committee for the last few years. I have tried to give my best in leading our committee in our various projects/ engagements with the judiciary/authorities with the aim of improving the practice of family law for our members and the public. However, due to new commitments, I will no longer be able to continue as the Co-Chair of the Family Law Committee beyond 1.6.2020.
I have spoken to our President and my Co-Chair, Dato' Tharuma, both of whom are aware and understanding of my present constraints. The FLC will be in the good hands of Dato' Tharuma. 

FLC's strength is our teamwork and warm camaraderie, enhanced by good nasi lemak/muruku/cookies/cakes! This is reason why we have been able to achieve some measure of change in the family law landscape. No doubt there is always so much more to be done. Rest assured, I will continue to support FLC and the Collaborative Law Movement behind the scenes.

My deep appreciation to my Co-Chairs, Deputy Co-Chairs, BC Officers, Rajeswari and Florence for their support and hard work. I thank our experienced and knowledgeable senior members of our committee for their mentoring and guidance. I am also grateful to so many of you who have volunteered selflessly - at a drop of an email, telephone call or WhatsApp message and taking on a myriad of tasks from attending brainstorming meetings, delivering talks/webinars, proof-reading grammar, drafting countless papers/research to attending meetings in Putrajaya. Your support has made this journey as Co-Chair less lonely and intimidating. 

Yesterday, I received a copy of Presiding Judge Justice Debbie Ong's Workplace Address dated 21.5.2020. This is attached. Singapore is moving from an adversarial system towards a system which is "problem solving" with a focus on delivering "Therapeutic Justice" under  a multi-disciplinary family system.  I've extracted and reproduced paragraphs 35 to 37 below which set out issues that I'm sure many of us commonly face:

A Sharpened Vision for Family Justice

35. In our sharpened vision for family justice, what needs to be done in preparation for the parties’ ‘new future’? Some parents think that they alone are enough for their child; they think they can take care of the child better than the other, and in fact they think that the child does not need the other parent. Other parents use their child as a tool for revenge. Here is a list of things NOT to do:

Do not send inflammatory letters to each other, and kill the chances of cooperation.

Do not allege the worst of the other spouse in affidavits in divorce proceedings, especially personally hurtful things, even going back 20 years or more.

Do not file many applications, only to increase costs and deplete savings, shrink the size of the matrimonial assets, and increase complexity unnecessarily.

Do not let the children suffer the conflict of loyalty and other sorts of stress, or burden them with your own issues. Do not ‘parentify’ the children and deprive them of a normal childhood.

Do not turn the children against the other parent; you may not need your ex-spouse anymore, but the children do.

36. Parties should not use the court proceedings to vent their frustrations. They should use therapeutic services to support them in respect of the emotional consequences of family breakdown. This list of DON’Ts will be part of our system. We will incorporate this list in considering the conduct we expect from parties as their legal responsibility.

37. What then should we do instead? We should focus on Therapeutic Justice in our sharpened vision for family justice. ...."

Family lawyering is indeed difficult and draining, but so very important as we have the opportunity to add positive value to the lives of the families we represent.
To end, let me leave you with a quote from former Chief Justice of the Family Court of Australia, "I want to thank the profession. Your work can be dangerous, confronting and exhausting but the system would not function without you."
Wishing you a good weekend and keep Covid-19 safe!
Warmest regards,
Goh Siu Lin

Sunday, March 29, 2020

TOP TIPS FOR DIVORCED OR SEPARATED PARENTS DURING THE MOVEMENT CONTROL ORDER AND THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

 

Since the 2-week long Movement Control Order (“MCO”) came in force on 18th of March, 2020, the daily routines of many have been drastically impacted as schools and businesses have been forced to close and movement being restricted save for very limited reasons, e.g. to perform an official duty, to make a journey to and from any premises providing essential services, to purchase, supply or deliver food or daily necessities, to seek healthcare or medical services or any other special purposes permitted by the Director General.
With so much uncertainty in the air and our Prime Minister’s latest announcement that the MCO is now extended for a further two weeks until the 14th of April, 2020, where does it leave the separated or divorced parents who have joint-custody of their child or are entitled to access but are unable to exercise it because of this MCO?
These real concerns are not specific only to divorced or separated parents in Malaysia, as many co-parents in other countries are also facing the same issues. So hopefully, to help take the edge off your co-parenting concerns, here are our TOP 8 SUGGESTIONS to help divorced or separated parents to get through this confusing time.

  1. STAY INFORMED AND ALERT OF THE NEWS
Stay abreast of the latest news regarding the Covid-19 situation and be aware of the guidelines and the credible health advice given by the government on how to protect yourself and your loved ones from Covid-19 infections.
Good sources of information are generally the Ministry of Health (@KKMPutrajaya) or the Prime Minister’s Department’s (@jpmgov_) twitter or other social media platforms as they are constantly being updated with the latest news and reports. Alternatively, faithfully check credible news outlets, such as the Star, News Straits Times, the Malay Mail, Berita Harian, Harian Metro and Sinar Harian.

  1. EDUCATE AND REASSURE YOUR CHILD
This can be a confusing time for children as they are suddenly on an “extended” school holiday but are told they cannot go out and are forced to wear a mask for no apparent reason.
It is important to explain and make sure that your child understands why he or she needs to take precautions to protect himself or herself from Covid-19 and the need to abide by the MCO. You should be honest about the seriousness of the pandemic so that your child understands the situation. However, it is also important not to overly alarm your child and to reassure him or her that things will improve and stabilise over time.
If you are not sure how to explain the Covid-19 situation to your child, please feel free to check out the various online articles / videos providing guidelines on how you may do so without scaring your child unnecessarily. Some websites you may refer to are:

  1. BE A GOOD ROLE MODEL
Abide by the MCO and stay at home. Practice good hygiene habits and instill the same in your child. Children, particularly young ones, learn best by watching and observing those around them. Hence this is the best time to put the term “monkey see, monkey do” to the test.
You could teach your child how to cook, watch shows together, talk, read a book, help him or her with homework (if you know how!) or maybe do some yoga together. Spend as much time to bond with your child because who knows when such an opportunity will come about again.

  1. BE REASONABLE WITH ACCESS
Notwithstanding the MCO, many parents are confused about what the Covid-19 MCO means for their children and access arrangements.
Some useful guidance may be obtained from the well-written judgment of 24.3.2020 by Justice Pazaratz of the Family Court of Hamilton, Canada of Ribeiro v Wright (2020) ONSC 1829 (CanLII). The main points of his decision from paragraphs 10 to 18, are reproduced below:
10      None of us know how long this crisis is going to last.  In many respects we are going to have to put our lives “on hold” until COVID-19 is resolved.  But children’s lives – and vitally important family relationships – cannot be placed “on hold” indefinitely without risking serious emotional harm and upset.  A blanket policy that children should never leave their primary residence – even to visit their other parent – is inconsistent with a comprehensive analysis of the best interests of the child.  In troubling and disorienting times, children need the love, guidance and emotional support of both parents, now more than ever
11        In most situations there should be a presumption that existing parenting arrangements and schedules should continue, subject to whatever modifications may be necessary to ensure that all COVID-19 precautions are adhered to – including strict social distancing. 
12        In some cases, custodial or access parents may have to forego their times with a child, if the parent is subject to some specific personal restriction (for example, under self-isolation for a 14 day period as a result of recent travel; personal illness; or exposure to illness).
13        In some cases, a parent’s personal risk factors (through employment or associations, for example) may require controls with respect to their direct contact with a child.
14        And sadly, in some cases a parent’s lifestyle or behaviour in the face of COVID-19 (for example, failing to comply with social distancing; or failing to take reasonable health-precautions) may raise sufficient concerns about parental judgment that direct parent-child contact will have to be reconsidered.  There will be zero tolerance for any parent who recklessly exposes a child (or members of the child’s household) to any COVID-19 risk.
15        Transitional arrangements at exchange times may create their own issues.  At every stage, the social distancing imperative will have to be safeguarded.  This may result in changes to transportation, exchange locations, or any terms of supervision.
16        And in blended family situations, parents will need assurance that COVID-19 precautions are being maintained in relation to each person who spends any amount of time in a household – including children of former relationships.
17        Each family will have its own unique issues and complications.  There will be no easy answers.
18        But no matter how difficult the challenge, for the sake of the child we have to find ways to maintain important parental relationships – and above all, we have to find ways to do it safely.
(Emphasis ours)
A similar view was shared by the Irish District Court President, Colin Daly who was of the opinion that, although the restrictions put in place by the Irish Government meant the detail of every access order “may not be full implementable”, it was acceptable for parents to temporarily vary the access arrangements, provided this was done by agreement. He also said that where a child does not get to spend normal access time with a parent, the court would expect contact to be maintained regularly by video calls or over the phone.
Therefore, where court orders are involved or a parenting plan is in existence, parties are to comply unless there is a reasonable excuse not to. Keep in mind that under a joint custody order, both parents are entitled to have shared custody of the child and the reason such an order exists is for children to spend time with both parents, to facilitate smooth handovers and avoid acrimony/arguments between the parents, to minimise distress to the children.
Some examples of a “reasonable” excuse with Covid-19 considerations would include, among others:
    1. a medical professional from the Ministry of Health directing a parent/child(ren) to go into quarantine;
    2. Evidence or examples of behavior or plans by the other parent which breach COVID-19 safety protocols, failure to adhere to social distancing and blatant non-compliance with public health directives.
Thus, in the event of breach of the court orders or failure to provide a reasonable excuse, the other parent may file an application to court and the parent in breach may be ordered to provide replacement access time and/or face potential contempt proceedings at a future time.

  1. BE CREATIVE AND FLEXIBLE
Understandably many people have been affected by the MCO, with many having to work from home or having suffered a change in working hours or simply being unable to commute due to the MCO restrictions and police road blocks. Offer replacement access periods to the parent who has not been able to access the child due to the MCO. It is always best to be reasonable in such circumstances, as any unreasonable behavior is generally frowned upon and hard to justify in court.
The custodial parent ought to consider discussing alternative modes of access to the child with the other parent. For example, suggest or encourage the child to contact and spend time with the non-custodial parent through online conferencing platforms such as Facetime, Skype, Zoom, et cetera. You could also suggest the child and non-custodial parent exchange their favourite books, play online games together, watch Netflix together, et cetera.
At all times, bear in mind that the Family Court expects parties to be reasonable in accommodating requests by the non-resident parent when usual access arrangements in public locations are no longer permitted by reason of the MCO.
So parents, be the bigger person during this crisis. Where possible be kind to your child(ren)’s other parent. If this is too difficult, then strive for a civil exchange.
To quote Justice Pazaratz in Ribero v. Wright, the Court’s expectations of parents during these challenging times would be:
We will be looking to see if parents have made good faith efforts to communicate; to show mutual respect; and to come up with creative and realistic proposals which demonstrate both parental insight and COVID-19 awareness.

  1. BE TRANSPARENT
Keep the non-custodial parent informed about any suspected or confirmed exposure to the Covid-19 virus, particularly if the child is exhibiting symptoms of the infection. Keep each other informed of the steps you wish to take to protect the child before the child is taken into your care so that the other parent can feel reassured about the child’s health and wellbeing.

  1. BE SAFE
Many families may be struggling with disruption to their lives which may result in heightened stress and anxiety. Vulnerable members of these families would need support particularly those who may be facing domestic violence and sexual abuse. Apart from reaching out to the police, family members in distress may reach out for help by calling these hotlines:
  • Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO): 03-7956 3488 / SMS or Whatsapp (24 hours): 108-988 8058
  • WCC Penang: 016-428 7265/ 011-310 84001 /016-418 0342 / 016- 439 0698
  • Talian Kasih Helpline (Ministry of Women, Family & Community Development): 15999
  • All Women’s Action Society (AWAM)03-7877 4221 / awam@awam.org.my

Mental Health counselling:
  • Befrienders: Hotline 603-79568145 / email sam@befrienders.org.my
  • Mercy Malaysia Psychosocial Support Line (8am – 5pm): 011-6399 6482/ 011-6399 4236 / 03-2935 9935
  • Kin and Kids, Marriage Family and Child Therapy centre: +6019-380 0902 / +6018-667 0902
  • Rekindle (9am – 6pm, Mon – Sat): 019-369 8519 / email: enquiries@rekindletherapy.com
  • CLM: 03-2095 6360 / make an appointment via their website http://clm.org.my/about-us/
  • Department of Social Welfare / Jabatan Kebajikan Rakyat: Headquarter’s Telephone No. 03 – 8000 8000 / You could head to any of the District Social Welfare Office / state near you to make inquiries. You can check for the closest officer at: http://www.jkm.gov.my/jkm/index.php?r=portal/directory&id=UzlRTjkxUVFUa2Q5a0hFVm1UQXZuUT09
  • Alternatively, you could drop by any Health Clinic / Klinik Kesihatan to obtain a referral letter for counselling at a government hospital.

  1. BE UNDERSTANDING
Many people are suffering financially from the MCO and it seems inevitable that the future will bring economically challenging times. Therefore, it is all the more important that parents who both care for the wellbeing of their families, should continue contributing to spousal and/or child maintenance and cooperate for their child(ren)’s best interest.
If the paying parent is suffering some financial hardship, he/she should still try to contribute what he/she is able to afford, even if it cannot be the full amount. The receiving parent should similarly try to be kind and accommodating under the circumstances, to espouse the spirit of generosity advised by Justice Pazaratz: 
Right now, families need more cooperation. And less litigation.
None of us have ever experienced anything like this. We are all going to have to try a bit harder – for the sake of our children.”

Contributed by:
Goh Siu Lin and Denise Lim
Family, Probate & Trusts Department
Messrs Kee Sern, Siu & Huey

Friday, December 13, 2019

The Butterfly Effect - President's Address, Annual General Meeting of the Association of Women Lawyers 27 April 2017

For archival purposes, I'm reproducing below my speech as President as AWL @ 27.4.2017

The Butterfly Effect - President's Address, Annual General Meeting of the Association of Women Lawyers 27 April 2017

  • Posted on: 10 May 2017
  •  
  • By: admin1

 
 

 
PRESIDENTS ADDRESS
 
A warm welcome to all of you. Thank you for attending AWL’s 34th Annual General Meeting. It is marvellous to see new and familiar faces amongst us. For the benefit of our new members, it would be appropriate for me to begin with a brief history of AWL.
 
AWL was established in 1983 by the diligence, foresight, sacrifice and commitment on the part of our founding members -  Dato’ Noor Farida Ariffin, Tan Sri Dato Seri Siti Norma Yaacob, Dato’ Ambiga Sreenivasan and Chen Kah Leng. In those early years, AWL was one of five (5) women’s groups[1] whose tireless advocacy and lobbying efforts culminated  in the passing of the Domestic Violence Act 1994[2]. Malaysia was a pioneer and the first country in the Asia-Pacific region then to have domestic violence legislation.
 
However, subsequent to those early trail-blazing years, AWL, under the unfortunate moniker of FOWL[3] (Federation of Women Lawyers, Malaysia), fell into a downward spiral and appeared to have lost its significance for well over a decade.
 
Fortunately, in 2008, we managed to shed our FOWL feathers and went through a process of renewal and reinvention, emerging like a phoenix from the ashes. A few individuals were instrumental in leading this change to revamp the society’s structure and mission. Some of these individuals are here with us today, Ms Jane Pragasam, Ms Vicky Alahakone and our immediate past President, Ms Meera Samanther. 
 
As the society began to regain its footing, there was recognition of the need to support female lawyers in the profession but empirical data was required to provide credibility to any proposals or projects for change.
 

 
The beginnings of an idea for a survey was suggested[4] over a latte by Sheena Gurbakhash to our immediate past-President, Ms Meera Samanther. On 26 June 2014, that idea became a reality! The Findings of the Baseline Survey[5]on the Working Conditions of Male and Female Lawyers in KL & Selangor was officially launched at the KL Bar Auditorium with copies of the Baseline Survey ceremoniously handed to the then President of the Malaysian Bar[6](Mr. Christopher Leong) and both Chairmen of the KL and Selangor State Bars. Notably at that time, no female lawyer had ever held the chairman post for both State Bars.
 
 
 
 
The AWL Baseline Survey provides hard data that women lawyers faced gender discrimination and vindicated what in the past, had been mere anecdotal accounts.  Key areas were identified with recommendations and programmes to eradicate gender inequality in the legal profession. 
 
 
In October 2016, AWL was invited by the Thailand Institute of Justice (TIJ) to participate in the South East Asian Regional Roundtable Discussion on “Women As Justice-Makers[7] held in Bangkok. We were most elated to have been given the privilege of presenting a copy of our AWL Baseline Survey to the then Australian Ambassador for Women & Girls, H.E. Natasha Stott Despoja.
 
 
 

 
The AWL Baseline Survey provided the seed that grew into an organic collaboration between AWL and the Bar Council, leading to the formation of the Gender Equality Initiatives (GEI), a platform to raise awareness on issues on gender discrimination amongst students of local law colleges.
 
Last year, the theme “Women in Leadership Positions” was selected for the GEI Colloquium[8] held in June, 2016 and the GEI Moot in November 2016. Special thanks to the organising team led by Meera Samantha and Santhi Latha, our Secretary, Kathlyn Lee who delivered the Colloquium keynote address and our Treasurer, Daniella Zulkifili who crafted the moot problems based on real-life case studies. The GEI theme and moot questions were intended to make the students to think and analyse why was there a dearth of women in leadership roles. Is there discrimination? If yes, why does such discrimination exist? What were the underlying root causes? These questions and more, highlight and bring into focus the barriers to a woman’s career and leadership progression - issues such as pregnancy and the double burden of child and elder care.
 

 

To me, it was an extremely befitting theme given my own personal experiences and the internal mental struggles I had to overcome before deciding to stand for the post of Chair at the Kuala Lumpur Bar Elections earlier this year, on 23 February 2017. But I did it! We did it!
 
I now move on to the AWL Annual Report which chronicles the hard work of the society. The successful implementation of our projects was only possible with the passion and dedication demonstrated by my fellow Exco members. We do this work not for ourselves. Our success and satisfaction comes from helping other people, advocating for gender-sensitive laws and policies[9], working for a more inclusive bar and educating others[10]. We work so that the term “feminist” will one day shed its unfair negative connotations and to narrow the gender gap[11].
 
The next stage is for AWL to continue on its mission to advocate for an enabling environment for women lawyers. A platform for women lawyers to speak out about what we can do for one another. Mentoring, friendships, supportive networks whether formal or informal. To help someone behind us to accomplish and fulfil their fullest potential, to level the playing field.
 
Next, is a project close to my heart, the AWL’s Child Sexual Crimes team. This originally began in late 2015 as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) project in collaboration with the AG’s Chambers, WCC Penang, relevant governmental stakeholders and child-focused NGOs.
In 2016, one representative each from AWL and WCC Penang, were selected to represent the Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG) at the Sexual Crimes Taskforce[12] which led to the eventual tabling of the Sexual Offences Against Children Bill (SOAC)[13]. It gives me great delight to inform you today that the SOAC Bill was passed last night by the Dewan Negara[14].
 
 
 
We would like to thank Melissa Akhir of WCC Penang and our Vice President, Tham Hui Ying. Melissa (also an AWL member) and Hui Ying were tremendous sources of support during the hectic weeks in March and April this year during our SOAC engagement with Parliamentarians. It’s been a wonderful journey. So far, what moves each and every one of us is the possibility of making a difference and the exhilarating feeling that comes when we see it crystallise and happen.
 
Needless to say, our work to strengthen victim support services for child victims of sexual crimes is far from over. AWL continues to support the Star’s R.AGE Team in this area. Most recently, we have been invited to participate in the filming of a mock trial[15] on the new offence of sexual grooming, to take place next Saturday. 
I don’t believe anyone has to wait to make a difference. Your ability to impact others never stops. If you say no, you only shut yourself from opportunities, like attending a networking event, meeting new people and transforming mindsets, others and yours. So what I would advise is, be open to opportunity and from my personal experience, life has begun to change in a very positive way. It has not always been easy, it is hard work, there are costs and sacrifice involved. However, we should take on the challenge and stretch ourselves to gain new experiences and skill sets.
To conclude, how many of you have heard of the Butterfly Effect[16]?  I read about this recently and it’s a powerful illustration of how little acts can result in dramatic effects. The butterfly effect chaos theory is that a butterfly flapping its wings in South America can affect weather patterns causing a typhoon halfway around the world!
 
 
So, we owe it to the next generation of women lawyers to put our hands down and pull them up. These small gestures will have tremendous and lasting impact on the careers of women. Together, we can be very powerful. Let us be part of the solution. Let us effect amazing change…  just like those butterflies, right here in Malaysia.
 
Thank you.
 
GOH SIU LIN
President
Association of Women Lawyers (2015-2017)
 
 
[1] Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO), Association of Women's Lawyers (AWL), Malaysian Trade Unions Congress Women's Section, University Women's Association (University Malaya) and the Selangor and Federal Territory Consumers' Association
[7] https://www.facebook.com/pg/AWLMalaysia/photos/?tab=album&album_id=1173118259402223 “Women and girls in the justice system should not only been seen as "passive citizens, victims, inmates or mere onlookers but also as lawmakers, law enforcers, law supporters and indispensable resources for the system reform."
Malaysia is placed 106 out of 144 countries in the Global Gender Gap Index 2016
[12] http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1950293 “Azalina to head new taskforce on crimes against children”
[13] https://www.facebook.com/ragepmp/videos/623909834476959/ Predator in my Phone “Congratulations Malaysia, We did it.”
[14] 26 April, 2017. http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v8/ge/newsgeneral.php?id=1351030 “Dewan Negara Passes Sexual Offences Against Children Bill 2017"
[15] At ILKAP on 6 May 2017